Amour & Magie forum!!

Forum of and for Albena and Max's friends and fans :))
 
HomeHome  PortalPortal  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  Log in  

Share | 
 

 Maxim in driving accident

Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1 ... 9 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
AuthorMessage
viktoria
AM close friend
AM close friend


Number of posts : 1255
Age : 36
Residence : LA
Registration date : 2007-01-23

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Tue 12 May - 20:02

Finally is over. poklon From here i wish all the best to Albie and Max heart2 and continue to pray for Manuela heart2 to recover completely and for Petar's parents to find peace and comfort in their grief. zvet
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Petra
AM akin
avatar

Number of posts : 3667
Age : 49
Residence : Germany
Registration date : 2007-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Tue 12 May - 20:03

OMG!!

It´s over!!! :vo:

Without the possibility to appeal!!!!
This is FANTASTIC!!!!

Thank you soooo much for finding and posting this good news, Vala ohhhh !!!

At the moment I´m completely overwhelmed with emotions!!!
Thanks to everybody who has given support!!!!

And now I only wish that Albie and Maxi can make something positive out of the rest of their life :vo: !!!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
tanuki
AM fan novice
AM fan novice
avatar

Number of posts : 39
Age : 36
Residence : Germany
Registration date : 2009-05-02

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Tue 12 May - 20:08

I'm doing the HAPPY dance as well!! Wow!! I feel so happy for them... heart2 :stari:
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Petra
AM akin
avatar

Number of posts : 3667
Age : 49
Residence : Germany
Registration date : 2007-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Tue 12 May - 20:30

Resolution number 187: The case Maxim Staviski, 12.05.2009, by Supreme Court / Sofia!

Thanks to Kali zvet from Bulgarian forum!

Link: http://www.vks.bg/vks_p10_27.htm

Translation by google, part 1:
"Decision in the case of Maxim Staviyski

DECISION № 187
Sofia, 12.05.2009 years

In the name of the people

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Bulgaria, the Second Criminal Division at the hearing on April fifteenth in the year two thousand and nine as follows:

CHAIRMAN: Grapes Iliev
MEMBERS: Yuri Krastev, ELENA AVDEVA

Secretary in KRISTIAN Pavlov and in the presence of the prosecutor Anthony Lakov hear reported by Judge Elena Avdeva criminal case № 124 / 2009:

Proceedings on the case is formed on the basis of Code chl.349 on further appeal by the defender of the accused ME. C. and the private prosecutor and civil claimants D. P. P. and D. S. G. by their client against the decision № 166 of 30. 12. 2008 in vnohd № 232 / 2008 of the Court of Appeal in the city of B.

In the appeal the defender of the accused to reveal that stipulation in the act of appeals allowed material breach of procedural rules imposed punishment is manifestly unfair, and increase the amount of damages awarded for moral damages suffered by the civil claimants does not comply with the statutory requirements for fairness. According kasatora vazzivniyat tribunal set out the grounds on the repeal of Art. 66 of the Penal Code and is not considered adopted during the judicial inquiry documentary evidence related to the procedural conduct of the defendant and his degree of public danger. The apparent injustice of the punishment imposed argues with arguments from case law that does not preclude the application of conditional sentencing in transport crimes committed by drivers of motor vehicles in the jag. Underlines that, isolation of the defendant for a long period of time will not contribute to the objectives of both the special and general preventsiya.velichenite amounts of compensation for moral damages is challenged as payment for real sweat and excess usually awarded by courts amounts.

Finally made the request for annulment of the decision and return the case for further consideration by the hearing stage of vazzivniya court or, alternatively, to sustain the effective abolition of the penalty and reduction of benefits for moral damages to attend the first instance sizes.

In the appeal of civil claimants and private prosecutor PS and D. G. disputed the fairness of the benefit awarded in compensation for moral damages, as alleged, that they are unreasonably low and not consistent with the pain and suffering suffered by increased inflation in the country, escalating global crisis and award damages in the European Union and other countries. These arguments are seeking amendment of the decision of the appellate court in the civil part and respect for civil claims in the amount claimed.

At the hearing before the cassation instance defenders defendant in support of the complaint set out in its reasons, citing case law to support them.

Charge of the applicants - applicants civil and private prosecutor PS and D. G. insists on increasing the amount of awarded damages in their favor.

Ward private prosecutor and civil prosecution M. G. authorized by her guardian D. G., expressing an opinion on the fairness of vazzivnoto decision.

Prosecutor advocate for respect of the appeal of the defendant and the deposition of wear out of the penalty imposed imprisonment under Art. 66, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code as of prevazpitanieto M. S. started from the time of the act. The prosecutor noted and world renown of the defendant achieved with hard work and long associated with it a positive feature of his personality. representative of the prosecution believes the appeal of civil claimants to be unfounded.

Defendants in his last word before the cassation instance expresses deep regret for the fatal consequences of an act done, stating that it is realized and experienced daily done to public reproach.

The Supreme Court of Cassation, the second criminal department, after considering the arguments of the parties and verified within the chl.347, paragraph 1 of the Code, establishes the following:


to be continued!


Last edited by Petra on Tue 12 May - 20:39; edited 4 times in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
evagremmert
knowing AM closer..
knowing AM closer..


Number of posts : 7
Age : 61
Residence : Carnation, WA USA
Registration date : 2007-10-29

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Tue 12 May - 20:34

I am completely overwhelmed as it seems that many of our friends are. I want to laugh and cry at the same time. bounce
Eva
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Petra
AM akin
avatar

Number of posts : 3667
Age : 49
Residence : Germany
Registration date : 2007-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Tue 12 May - 20:37

Part 2 of the translation of the judgement:

"District court in the town of sentence B. № 14 of 30.01.2008 years № 292/2007 on nohd defendant admitted on S. E. M. convicted that year of 05.08.2007, the secondary path and -99 under control of a motor vehicle jag distortion of Art.21, para 2 in connection with paragraph 1 of ZDvP as negligence caused the death of P. and D. P. mayhem and three medium injury by M. K. G., and therefore the basis of Art. 343, para. H b. "B" in conjunction with para. 4 in connection with paragraph 1 and Art. 342, paragraph 1 Penal Code in connection with chl.373, par.2 Code in connection with chl.55, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Penal Code it sentenced to two years and six months imprisonment. On the basis of Art. 66, para. 1 of the Penal Code the court postponed the implementation of designated penalty for a period of five years from the entry into force of the sentence. Defendant was acquitted on indictments for violation of Art. 5, paragraph 2, item 3, Article 6, paragraph 1 and Art. 20 para 2 of ZDvP and art. 47, para. H and art. 63, 2, p.1 otPPZDvP.

On the basis chl.343g in relation to Art.37, paragraph 1, of the Penal Code t.7 court deprived the defendant of the right to operate a motor vehicle for a period of four years of entry into force of the sentence.

With the same conviction M. S. was sentenced to pay any civil claimants and private prosecutor G. PS and D. S. D. of 90 000 BGN, representing compensation for incurred their moral damages together with legal interest from the date of injury until the final payment amounts as well as 4 815, 75 euro compensation for property damage incurred, together with the interest of the damage until the final payment. In the rest made to sizes of 250 000 leva for moral damages claims were rejected.

Defendant was sentenced to pay civil and private prosecutor ishttsa M. K. D. amount of BGN 80 000, representing compensation for moral damages suffered ^ together with the interest from the date of injury until the final payment amount. In the remainder of the claim made by the provisional custodian of the amount M. D. 2 000 000 euro was rejected.

In the severity of the defendant and the court assigned to the case so charges and government taxes due.

Appellate Court in the city of B. Resolution № 36 of 07.05.2008 years № 57/2008 on vnohd fully confirmed on first conviction.

The Supreme Court, first criminal division, a decision № 399/27.10.2008 on repealed vazzivnoto decision pursuant to Art. 354, para. 3, item 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and returned the case to the appellate court for further consideration of the stage of the hearing. The majority of the court staff / decision was given in view of special rapporteur on the case / found that the previous instance was not set out reasons in response to the arguments adduced in vazzivniya protest and appeals related to the material apparent illegality and injustice of the punishment. In a decision set aside is noted serious difficulties for the verification of the evaluation process of the court action because of unclear, inaccurate and short sazhdeniya associated with the accepted facts relevant to the proper individualization of punishment.

In further consideration of the case the Court of Appeal in the city of B. Resolution № 166 of 30.12.2008 / reservation established by the judge rapporteur / partially amended sentence of the District Court as

• revoked the application of chl.66 of the Penal Code and held to iztarpi M. S. imposed penalty of two years and six months imprisonment with an initial mild prison regime.

• increased damages awarded to D. and D. P. P. S. D. 90 000 BGN 120 000 leva for each of them and M. K. From 80 000 EUR 150 000 EUR, condemned as a defendant to pay another 5 200 leva state tax increase claims



In cassation appeal of the defendant



The appeal is partly justified.

This Court does not share the statement of kasatora for substantial procedural defect, vazzivniya by the court due to lack of reasoning on how to sustain the imposition of penalties involving deprivation of liberty. Reasoning of the second solution, despite its limited volume sufficiently disclose the internal conviction of the vessel and prevents further not check its accuracy. On p. 5 and p. 6 presents considerations for the type, size and how to sustain the defendants' designated penalty. Appellate Court agreed with the court defined a primary responsibility aggravating and mitigating circumstances and found prevalence of trouble. After it is recalled that under chl.55, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Penal Code the maximum possible amount of the penalty is three years imprisonment because the defendant has recognized fully the facts set out in the circumstances of the indictment and trial is considered under Chapter 27 of the Code "Abbreviated legal consequence in the proceedings at first instance. Based on these findings, the court staff concluded that the punishment two years and six months imprisonment is near the maximum legal and equitable. In his reflections on how to sustain that court sanction editorial used the technique of incorporation of some of the reasons why the first instance on the relevant facts as listed some of them - the positive characteristic data of the individual defendant, the absence of ANTI and illegal activities correct behavior and procedural samokritichnost. Vazzivniyat Court, however, is distinguished from conclusion of the previous instance, that these circumstances make the suspension of the penalty accordingly sustain the goals of general prevention, as opposed following arguments, serious crime is committed within the meaning of art. 93 NK t.7 of injury due to severe / death of a person and serious bodily injury to another, and M. C., although a face of a national campaign against driving in intoxication, driving a motor vehicle after use alcohol! According to the appellate court the application of Art. 66, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code gives exclusive priority to the individual at the expense of prevention and the general injustice can be overcome by effectively sustain ruled to imprisonment for a term of two years and six months in prison initial common mode.

Vazzivnoto review of the decision demonstrates that there is no shortage of information to the extent of lack of justification under Art. 348, para. H, item 1 of the PPC, which claim the protection of the defendant for his revocation and return the case for further consideration should be rejected.

Further appeal is justified in part by which disputed the fairness of vazzivnoto decision because the court refused to apply the institute of provisional chl.66 a conviction of Penal Code.

Appellate authority has referred to the seriousness of the harmful result and the definition of chl.93, item 7 of the Penal Code classification of the offense under Art. 343, para. 3 b. "B" in connection with paragraph 4 of the Penal Code as serious and thus is a priori excluded in these cases even be conditional sentencing. Summarizing the understanding that no legal support and is not consistent with the idea of human punishment. Court and admitted violation of Penal Code chl.56 as experienced in the re-individualization of punishment circumstances, in accordance of the law in determining the composition of the offense. Implementation of conditional sentencing is always strictly a matter which does not preclude discussion of any one category of crimes subject to the prescribed in chl.66, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code preconditions - have been imposed punishment imprisonment for up to three years person is not convicted to imprisonment for a crime of a general nature and the court finds that the objectives of punishment and primarily for the correction of the convicted is not necessary to iztarpi penalty.

The absence of a transitional sentence the defendant and the amount of fixed penalty in this case a mandatory assessment to defer its sustain. Appellate Court has rejected this option is ignored as a determining criterion chl.66, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code - the achievability of the defendant beyond the correction of conditions of prison sreda.prekvayki previous instance, it has given priority to the exclusive personal prevention vazzivnata instance is ignored facts of the case, which are crucial for the process of prevazpitanie of the defendant and overcome his mental attitudes that led to the offense. It is clear from the pleading that the defendant has a very positive characteristic data and before the act was led irreproachable way of life. Behavior as a driver does not reveal multiple or serious violations of the rules of movement. Until the incident is not punished for alcohol. According to forensic medical expertise in road accident was located in a mild degree of alcoholic intoxication. Immediately after the crash was M. S. pritekal aid to victims, tried to remove them from the damaged car and called for help. During the entire proceedings, he cooperated for its completion within a reasonable time, showing respect to the ongoing process. Appellate Court has not adequately assessed and the pursuit of the defendant to compensate the victims suffered by non-payment of damages in substantial amounts to an obligation is determined by effective judicial act.

In the contested decision is the reputation of the defendant solely in his iztalkuvana injury by focusing on the gap between the behavior as a driver and image advertising, which he built as a person of the campaign against driving in intoxication. Public disappointment ukorimostta undoubtedly increases the behavior of the defendant, but its impact on the level of public concern and its related criminal adequate measure of coercion should not be overstated. After the crime committed by M. S., is the subject of comment in the context of fraudulent public expectations to his personality, should be reported and negative changes occurred in attitudes towards it and the loss of prestige and popularity achieved with the cost of long efforts. The public should not be crucial in the process of individualization of punishment to the plane on its way to sustain because they are factors outside those specified in the legislation chl.66, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code. Summary, this Board finds that the correction of the defendant is not necessary to iztarpi sentence to be postponed by a maximum term provided by law five years. This will fully realize the potential of the conventional warning conviction because throughout this period is a real threat to M. S. iztarpi suspension penalty.

Implementation of conditional sentencing for a maximum probationary period and does not contradict the goals of general prevention. They are in dialectical relation to the purpose of preventing personal and work through it without being competitive in the ratio between them. Could not be expected that penalty, which exceeds the rigor necessary to correct convicted will impact on education and warning other members of society. The idea of a sanction as example for other members of society is another of the Bulgarian penal system. Only fair in form, size and method of punishment can sustain and implement the preventive function of criminal repression. There is a cassation grounds chl.348, al.5, item 2 of the Code for the revision of the contested decision with the use of chl.66 defined by the Penal Code relating to sanction the defendants' imprisonment.

This Court finds partially justified complaints of kasatora about the fairness of compensation for moral damages in favor of civil claimants after correction by the appellate court.

Vazzivnata instance invoke Art.52 of ZZD and increased benefits to each of the deceased parents of PS 90 000 BGN 120 000 leva, and M. G. - 80 000 leva, 150 leva to 000 argument that this is a fair reparirane of them suffered moral damages.


to be continued


Last edited by Petra on Tue 12 May - 20:42; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Petra
AM akin
avatar

Number of posts : 3667
Age : 49
Residence : Germany
Registration date : 2007-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Tue 12 May - 20:42

Part 3 of the translation of the judgement:

"Moral damages are not value terms and not subject to arithmetic calculation. Their nature is the pain and suffering the loss of relatives or people of other invaluable benefits such as health. The justification of the claims of claimants is shown, but the amount they exceed the limits outlined by relativniya criterion of Art.52 of ZZD - in fairness. This criterion is not abstract and takes into account the nature of the act, its consequences, the type and degree of fault and severity of injury. Legitimate term "in fairness" is largely filled with moral content and reflects the public evaluation of the intangible damage. Therefore, when they vazmezdyavane is important and established practice of judicial guidance on to similar cases, as in the intangible values equality in society is the most pure expression.

Assessed the benefit of the above items of 120 000 leva for each of the civil claimants G. P. and D. is high and should be reduced to the amount of 100 000 leva loss of their son P. could not be compensated, but these amounts to some extent, can alleviate the suffering of these negative emotions.

Ward by M. K. G. is sued for compensation for moral suffering of her damages in the amount of 2 000 000 leva.vazheniyat appellate court the amount of 150 000 leva exceed the damages awarded for the death of PS for each of the parents him, and established standards of judicial practice. Since the court is invoked and the continued treatment of ishttsata need refinement that the claim is not relevant to any compensation for property damage associated with treatment of M. In this process, seek vazmezdyavane only incurred pain and suffering caused by Her physical disability and all claims for costs incurred for drugs and medical procedures have a place in a separate civil proceedings.

To those already case law criteria and compensation should be reduced to 90 000 leva.

Above designated size and alleged benefits are awarded away from the criterion of fairness in Art.52 of ZZD and acquire criminal function.


The appeal of civil claimants and private prosecutor PS and D. G.

The complaint relates only to the damages awarded to applicants are unfair because of discrepancies as they incurred pain and suffering as parents of the deceased PS, and the inflationary process in the country and the award in the European Union and other benefits moral damages.

The complaint was unfounded.

Above regarding the appeal of the defendant were part of the considerations set out in this Chamber to reject the request of the plaintiffs to increase the compensation awarded to them. There is a need to add further that the date of injury to an award of compensation / some of them have already been paid by the defendant / not elapsed time in which to have been serious inflation process, deprived of the fair value of upheld of claims. Comparison with the award in the European Union and other benefits is very inappropriate because different economic situation in the country in which to assess any monetary claims, including those relating to moral values.

Lead of the above and pursuant to Art. 354, paragraph 2, item 1 and item H in conjunction with paragraph 1, item H and chl.348, al.5, Code 2 of the Supreme Court of Cassation, Criminal Division second



DECIDES:

Altereth decision № 166 of 30. 12. 2008 in vnohd № 232/2008 of the Appellate Court in gr.B., which amended sentence № 14/30.01.2008 laying on nohd № 292/2008 on a list of District Court B, as

• on the basis of Art. 66, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code imposed delay implementation of M.E.S. penalty of 2/dve / 6 years and / six / months imprisonment for a term of 5 / five / years from the entry into force of the sentence

• reduce the damages awarded for moral damages in favor of G.P.P. and D. C. 120 D. 000 / one hundred and twenty thousand / per 100 000 / one hundred thousand / euro for each and for M.K.G. 150 000 one hundred and fifty thousand / BGN 90 000 ninety thousand / euro

• reduces the amount of additional public hearing fee of 5200 / five thousand two hundred / EUR 800 / eight hundred / euro

Confirmed the decision in the rest part.

The decision is not subject to appeal.

CHAIRMAN: [signature]

MEMBERS: 1. [signature]

2. [signature]
"
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Ivana
AM in love
AM in love
avatar

Number of posts : 151
Age : 35
Residence : Slovakia
Registration date : 2007-04-26

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Tue 12 May - 20:42

OMG! I don't know what to say.
Finally it's over. poklon poklon poklon
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Wondergirl
AM deeply in love
AM deeply in love
avatar

Number of posts : 285
Age : 34
Residence : Belarus
Registration date : 2008-12-12

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Tue 12 May - 23:54

OMG poklon I can't believe it poklon Thanks God all is over now heart2
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Petra
AM akin
avatar

Number of posts : 3667
Age : 49
Residence : Germany
Registration date : 2007-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Wed 13 May - 1:45

Link: http://news.ibox.bg/news/id_1321793998 (in Bulgarian)

Translation by google:
"Lawyer: In the court decision in the case Staviskogo there is no winners.
"In this case, there is no winner. It shows how difficult and perhaps impossible to estimate the value of human life, loss and retribution, which should be in the result."
So comment to news.bg Yavir Notev, one of the lawyers of Maxim Staviski, to today's Supreme Court decision.
However, he added: "We can not be satisfied with the decision but it is taken in the right direction for us."
Notev said that he and Staviski, whom he had personally informed of the decision of the Court of Cassation, were surprised by the fact that SCC (=Supreme Court) had decided before the recommended deadline. Remember, it will expire on May 15 (Friday).
Replying to a question about how to respond from a figure skater, Notev replied: "I felt that I have reassured him that the possibility that he was deprived of liberty is no longer required. It will be useful outside the prison," - he said.
Counsel stated that a final verdict on the case Staviski will not be able to restore lost faith in people and change people's pet in person convicted of manslaughter. No one will return and the dead boy, this is impossible, and be happy country, said Notev.
The lawyer added that today's decision of the Court of Cassation has shown that it works fairly, wisely and objectively. Thus, according to Notev, a society that generally has shown very keen interest in this case may believe that the judicial system works objectively.
Replying to a question about the prevailing view at the forum news.bg, namely, that the decision of the Court shows that our judicial system works the opposite way in which he describes, the lawyer replied:
"Maybe your readers who have a positive opinion on the decision of the Court today simply does not see the necessity to write in the forum."
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Vania
AM bg team
AM bg team
avatar

Number of posts : 4637
Age : 41
Residence : Bulgaria
Registration date : 2006-03-27

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Wed 13 May - 9:07

According to the tv channel BTV, Albena and Max were on the ice in the moment when the news of the sentence was spread in the medias.

_________________
Back to top Go down
View user profile
piemontesina
AM forever in love
AM forever in love
avatar

Number of posts : 880
Age : 46
Residence : Torino
Registration date : 2007-05-11

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Wed 13 May - 13:03

Petra wrote:
OMG!!

It´s over!!! :vo:

Without the possibility to appeal!!!!
This is FANTASTIC!!!!

Thank you soooo much for finding and posting this good news, Vala ohhhh !!!

At the moment I´m completely overwhelmed with emotions!!!
Thanks to everybody who has given support!!!!

And now I only wish that Albie and Maxi can make something positive out of the rest of their life :vo: !!!

OMG !!I am reading only now .. what a wooonderful news !!! poklon poklon
Thank you girls!! I am tooo happy!! loveall
Dear Maxim and Albena you are finally free!!!
It's over!!! sunny
What a great moment for you ... Kisssssssssss and for us...!!

But, like Viky wrote ,me too "...continue to pray for Manuela to recover completely and for Petar's parents to find peace and comfort in their grief."
poklon poklon heart2
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Vania
AM bg team
AM bg team
avatar

Number of posts : 4637
Age : 41
Residence : Bulgaria
Registration date : 2006-03-27

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Wed 13 May - 13:11

Petra wrote:

Replying to a question about the prevailing view at the forum news.bg, namely, that the decision of the Court shows that our judicial system works the opposite way in which he describes, the lawyer replied:
"Maybe your readers who have a positive opinion on the decision of the Court today simply does not see the necessity to write in the forum."[/i]

I like the last sentence Smile It's so true, it's easier to write bad and offensive things against someone, but those who still feel sympathy and who support Max don't write so often in this kind of forums.

_________________
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Petra
AM akin
avatar

Number of posts : 3667
Age : 49
Residence : Germany
Registration date : 2007-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Wed 13 May - 14:44

Wise words of Maxis lawyer really... Very Happy

Vania wrote:
but those who still feel sympathy and who support Max don't write so often in this kind of forums
zvet
Yes, the supporters wrote/write elsewhere... Wink
Back to top Go down
View user profile
tanuki
AM fan novice
AM fan novice
avatar

Number of posts : 39
Age : 36
Residence : Germany
Registration date : 2009-05-02

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Wed 13 May - 16:03

yeah, we don't have to go down to the level of the ones who post on the news pages, really... such comments get out of control quickly...
Back to top Go down
View user profile
viktoria
AM close friend
AM close friend


Number of posts : 1255
Age : 36
Residence : LA
Registration date : 2007-01-23

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Wed 13 May - 20:04

Vania wrote:
Petra wrote:

Replying to a question about the prevailing view at the forum news.bg, namely, that the decision of the Court shows that our judicial system works the opposite way in which he describes, the lawyer replied:
"Maybe your readers who have a positive opinion on the decision of the Court today simply does not see the necessity to write in the forum."[/i]

I like the last sentence Smile It's so true, it's easier to write bad and offensive things against someone, but those who still feel sympathy and who support Max don't write so often in this kind of forums.


Embarassed ...or don't even bother to read those comments.BTW since when the idiotic insults of someone who doesn't even know how to write or spell in their own language is a criteria for the public opinion. nooo
Back to top Go down
View user profile
cute_n_gorgeous
AM close friend
AM close friend
avatar

Number of posts : 1202
Age : 35
Residence : Hope to see A&M skating in some days!
Registration date : 2006-10-30

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Wed 13 May - 20:15

viktoria wrote:
Vania wrote:
Petra wrote:

Replying to a question about the prevailing view at the forum news.bg, namely, that the decision of the Court shows that our judicial system works the opposite way in which he describes, the lawyer replied:
"Maybe your readers who have a positive opinion on the decision of the Court today simply does not see the necessity to write in the forum."[/i]

I like the last sentence Smile It's so true, it's easier to write bad and offensive things against someone, but those who still feel sympathy and who support Max don't write so often in this kind of forums.


Embarassed ...or don't even bother to read those comments.BTW since when the idiotic insults of someone who doesn't even know how to write or spell in their own language is a criteria for the public opinion. nooo

When I saw all those nasty comments I was happy I can't read Bulgarian - but for what I understood these people are just disgusting!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
viktoria
AM close friend
AM close friend


Number of posts : 1255
Age : 36
Residence : LA
Registration date : 2007-01-23

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Thu 14 May - 0:11

BTV News

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x34xoeYNUhA
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Baghira
AM in love
AM in love
avatar

Number of posts : 191
Age : 32
Residence : Austria
Registration date : 2008-11-23

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Fri 15 May - 11:38

OMG it's over!!!!!
Suspended sentence?! That's GREAT news!!! I'm soooooo happy!
I've only been reading the forum for the last weeks, I just didn't feel like commenting anyhing because the whole situation was so sad :-(
But now I'm just sooooooooo happy!!!
sunny cheers Laughing heart2 poklon :vo: flower
But of course we shouldn't forget what Max' lawyers said: Nobody is the winner in this case...
Back to top Go down
View user profile
piemontesina
AM forever in love
AM forever in love
avatar

Number of posts : 880
Age : 46
Residence : Torino
Registration date : 2007-05-11

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Sat 16 May - 22:27

Girls, do you know something or have you found
some article about the reaction and
the emotional response of Maxim ( and Albena, of course)
after the sentence?

I can imagine their (externally) calm and serious reaction,
but I seem strange that nobody "cannibal" journalist
has asked for their opinions... Wink

Thanks in advance if you can answer me..
zvet zvet
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Petra
AM akin
avatar

Number of posts : 3667
Age : 49
Residence : Germany
Registration date : 2007-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Sat 16 May - 23:27

Until now I haven´t found a reaction of Albena and / or Maxim, Piemontesina...

Here´s another article about the accident:

Link: http://www.trud.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=133746 (in Bulgarian)

Translation by google:
"Staviski sentence decided by a 3:0 vote
Author: Ivaylo Krachunov

The fact that Maxim Staviski has attempted to give first aid to the injured in the accident caused by him, played a key role in the conditional sentence of 2 years and a half that was given by SCC. The three supreme judges voted unanimously for the punishment. Magistrates considered that if freedom, Maxim will pay more quickly the money from 100 per thousand for parents of dead Petar Petrov, and compensation of 90 thousand euro for the treatment of Manuela Gorsova, currently recovering from coma .

Albena and Maxim learned of the decision of the court by their lawyer Yavor Notev. "They were pretty excited. Sentencing is wise, said yesterday the "Trud" lawyer Notev. The star couple is currently in Moscow, where they participated in the show "Ice Age"."
Back to top Go down
View user profile
piemontesina
AM forever in love
AM forever in love
avatar

Number of posts : 880
Age : 46
Residence : Torino
Registration date : 2007-05-11

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Sat 16 May - 23:48

Petra wrote:


Here´s another article about the accident

...................................

Albena and Maxim learned of the decision of the court by their lawyer Yavor Notev. "They were pretty excited. Sentencing is wise, said yesterday the "Trud" lawyer Notev. The star couple is currently in Moscow, where they participated in the show "Ice Age"."[/i]

Thank you dear Petra !! ohhhh ohhhh
You deserve the "Golden Research Award " Very Happy Very Happy Bravo! Bravo!
Very Happy Very Happy
Back to top Go down
View user profile
7llewops
AM in love
AM in love


Number of posts : 127
Age : 68
Residence : USA
Registration date : 2007-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Mon 18 May - 6:28

To God be the glory for a just ending to a true human tragedy. In the almost three years that I have followed Maxim in cyberspace, I've watched him grow from a boy to a man. Never have I seen a more penitent soul in a situation where he knew he could do absolutely nothing to effect change. If my judgment of Maxim Staviski holds true, I know he will lift up his fellow man, put something back into the community that made him what he is, and leave this world a better place than he found it. He is a talented and gifted athlete who worked very hard to move the human spirit forward through his life's work--and I'm thinking of the culmination of his art in the performances of Adagio and the 7 Deadly Sins. I can only shallowly imagine the depth and scope of his future works because I have not borne his recent life experiences. But I think Maxim will show us all. Indeed, I think he will pour all of himself into his work, as did Tolstoy, and humanity will be the better for it. May God bless Russia. I love her.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Lana
AM dear sestrichka
AM dear sestrichka
avatar

Number of posts : 3145
Age : 30
Residence : Employed! And soon to be working full-time!!! :)
Registration date : 2006-03-27

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Tue 19 May - 16:43

A fair ending to a very sad state of affairs. zvet I think this is the best result for all parties involved. Smile
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Baghira
AM in love
AM in love
avatar

Number of posts : 191
Age : 32
Residence : Austria
Registration date : 2008-11-23

PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   Wed 20 May - 21:04

Thanks for the article Petra! ohhhh
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Maxim in driving accident   

Back to top Go down
 
Maxim in driving accident
Back to top 
Page 16 of 17Go to page : Previous  1 ... 9 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
 Similar topics
-
» driving on corrugations
» Maxim Trankov - Maria Mukhortova/ Tatiana Volozoshar Tread
» Uni. of Texas Kylie Doniak wins award after accident.
» Intentional or Accident?
» Driving around the old goldfields! Chewton Newstead Maryborough

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Amour & Magie forum!! :: Our Albenka and Max :) :: News-
Jump to: